PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.79%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MU's 11.36%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
4.84%
Cost growth 50-75% of MU's 8.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
7.87%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 17.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.01%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 5.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.52%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.84%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.30%
Operating expenses reduction while MU shows 4.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.49%
Total costs growth less than half of MU's 7.67%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.04%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.80%
D&A reduction while MU shows 10.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
17.60%
Similar EBITDA growth to MU's 17.03%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
10.13%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 5.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.68%
Operating income growth below 50% of MU's 30.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.52%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MU's 17.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
618.18%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.42%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of MU's 29.31%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
13.71%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to MU's 16.11%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
2.14%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
24.76%
Similar net income growth to MU's 23.04%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
16.83%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MU's 10.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
24.49%
Similar EPS growth to MU's 23.61%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
24.14%
Similar diluted EPS growth to MU's 22.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.22%
Share count change of 0.22% while MU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.32%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.