205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 5.21%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
4.86%
Similar cost growth to ON's 4.61%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
15.92%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 6.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.00%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ON's 1.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.27%
R&D reduction while ON shows 106.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.20%
Operating expenses reduction while ON shows 7.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.10%
Total costs growth less than half of ON's 5.23%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
D&A growth while ON reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.38%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 0.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
20.14%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ON's 50.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
75.90%
Operating income growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.85%
Operating margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.89%
Other expenses reduction while ON shows 11.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
46.09%
Pre-tax income growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.59%
Pre-tax margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
176.19%
Tax expense growth while ON reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.77%
Net income growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.95%
Net margin growth while ON declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
50.74%
Share count change of 50.74% while ON is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
51.98%
Diluted share change of 51.98% while ON is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.