PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.49%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.86%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.01%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.53%
Margin decline while ON shows 0.78% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.78%
R&D growth while ON reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.68%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.78%
Operating expenses reduction while ON shows 1.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.05%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.17%
Interest expense growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.99%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.20%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 13.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.44%
Operating income growth below 50% of ON's 17.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.95%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ON's 19.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-280.00%
Other expenses reduction while ON shows 42.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.61%
Pre-tax income decline while ON shows 24.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.13%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 26.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.60%
Tax expense growth while ON reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.70%
Net income decline while ON shows 32.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.26%
Net margin decline while ON shows 35.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
EPS decline while ON shows 37.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 38.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.46%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.54%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.