205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.35%
Revenue decline while ON shows 13.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-1.80%
Cost reduction while ON shows 6.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.52%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ON's 30.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.87%
Margin expansion below 50% of ON's 14.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.58%
R&D growth above 1.5x ON's 0.14%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.00%
Other expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.58%
Operating expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.63%
Total costs growth 50-75% of ON's 3.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-5.26%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.32%
D&A growth less than half of ON's 247.42%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-13.77%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 14.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.47%
EBITDA margin decline while ON shows 171.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.08%
Operating income decline while ON shows 229.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.74%
Operating margin decline while ON shows 189.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-98.31%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.17%
Pre-tax income decline while ON shows 531.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.87%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 454.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.67%
Tax expense reduction while ON shows 138.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.81%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.90%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.20%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x ON's 0.60%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.10%
Diluted share increase while ON reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.