PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.16%
Revenue decline while ON shows 1.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.43%
Cost reduction while ON shows 1.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.27%
Gross profit decline while ON shows 2.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.49%
Margin decline while ON shows 0.75% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.85%
R&D growth while ON reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.71%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.05%
Operating expenses reduction while ON shows 0.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.71%
Total costs reduction while ON shows 0.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.65%
Interest expense growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 3.69%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize debt strategy.
-9.09%
D&A reduction while ON shows 7.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.23%
EBITDA decline while ON shows 185.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.40%
Operating income decline while ON shows 416.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.52%
Operating margin decline while ON shows 411.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
188.89%
Other expenses growth while ON reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.44%
Pre-tax income decline while ON shows 197.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.44%
Pre-tax margin decline while ON shows 196.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
20.65%
Tax expense growth less than half of ON's 204.88%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-24.91%
Net income decline while ON shows 193.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.48%
Net margin decline while ON shows 191.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
EPS decline while ON shows 193.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.83%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 193.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while ON shows 1.52% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.21%
Diluted share reduction while ON shows 1.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.