PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.85%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x ON's 8.55%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
17.89%
Cost growth above 1.5x ON's 4.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
17.82%
Similar gross profit growth to ON's 17.87%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-0.02%
Margin decline while ON shows 8.59% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.85%
R&D change of 1.85% while ON maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.08%
Other expenses reduction while ON shows 114.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ON's 3.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.08%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ON's 0.72%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
0.40%
D&A growth less than half of ON's 1.49%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
19.67%
Similar EBITDA growth to ON's 21.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
1.55%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of ON's 23.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
31.03%
Operating income growth below 50% of ON's 176.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.19%
Operating margin growth below 50% of ON's 154.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-143.14%
Other expenses reduction while ON shows 5.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.08%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of ON's 78200.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.29%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of ON's 72045.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
331.68%
Tax expense growth while ON reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.96%
Net income decline while ON shows 11571.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.80%
Net margin decline while ON shows 10667.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.65%
EPS decline while ON shows 11570.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.03%
Diluted EPS decline while ON shows 11276.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.11%
Share count reduction below 50% of ON's 0.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ON's 2.00%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.