205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.88%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 15.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.50%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 18.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.46%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 9.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
169.45%
R&D growth above 1.5x QCOM's 10.72%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.97%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 10.34%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
22.69%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 16.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.97%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 14.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-181.54%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 10.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-183.96%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 0.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-155.87%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 8.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-157.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
340.00%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-142.39%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 6.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-143.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.05%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 7108.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-116.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-117.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.07%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.82%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.87%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 715.75%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.32%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 715.75% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.