205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.91%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.02%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
6.12%
Positive growth while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.10%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.71%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.26%
Operating expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.18%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-136.84%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 10.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-136.71%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 1.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-138.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-74.32%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 0.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
164.10%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
282.35%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
285.88%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
266.67%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
372.73%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
377.09%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.25%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.67%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.48%
Diluted share increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.