205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.68%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 5.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-14.91%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
9.32%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QCOM's 21.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.90%
Similar margin change to QCOM's 15.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
-3.44%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 13.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.16%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 11.45%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-10.50%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 2.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.15%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 14.74%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
71.01%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 41.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
81.31%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 9.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
33.50%
Operating income growth 50-75% of QCOM's 59.53%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
41.54%
Similar operating margin growth to QCOM's 50.84%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-67.39%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 39.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
14.86%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QCOM's 600.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.78%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 562.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.12%
Tax expense growth less than half of QCOM's 643.92%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
15.24%
Net income growth below 50% of QCOM's 583.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.18%
Net margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 545.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 572.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 572.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
45.37%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 715.06%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
42.90%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 702.60%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.