205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.31%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 1.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
1.26%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 3.48%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
3.64%
Positive growth while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.30%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.68%
R&D growth while QCOM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.42%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.37%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
3.08%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x QCOM's 2.67%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-122.86%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 8.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.14%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.33%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.84%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
366.67%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 77.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
25.17%
Similar pre-tax income growth to QCOM's 24.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
22.35%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to QCOM's 22.12%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
13.40%
Tax expense growth less than half of QCOM's 29.88%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
34.92%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 21.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
31.88%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 19.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
33.33%
Similar EPS growth to QCOM's 33.93%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 19.05%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-29.56%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-27.87%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 2.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.