205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.60%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.27%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
3.58%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of QCOM's 5.28%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.95%
Margin expansion below 50% of QCOM's 8.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.33%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 1.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 47.38%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.37%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 10.39%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.09%
Interest expense change of 9.09% while QCOM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-1.69%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 5.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.66%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.03%
EBITDA margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.43%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.75%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.21%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.54%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.17%
Tax expense growth less than half of QCOM's 48.93%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
6.10%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.41%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.45%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.56%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.99%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.94%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.