205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.38%
Similar revenue growth to QCOM's 1.58%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
-0.80%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.44%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of QCOM's 3.40%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.05%
Margin expansion 50-75% of QCOM's 1.79%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.77%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 4.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.08%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 65.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.97%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 5.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.23%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 1.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.27%
Interest expense growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.43%
D&A growth less than half of QCOM's 4.91%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
1.58%
Similar EBITDA growth to QCOM's 1.88%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.20%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of QCOM's 0.37%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
4.16%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 1.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.74%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-203.45%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 267.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.47%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QCOM's 6.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.10%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 4.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.47%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.83%
Net income growth below 50% of QCOM's 15.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.54%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 13.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.96%
EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 16.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.98%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 15.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.