205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.08%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.61%
Cost growth above 1.5x QRVO's 2.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.16%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1883.76%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-347.83%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-418.18%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2788.32%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2572.37%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 13.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2800.34%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2583.50%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 13.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-81510.00%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.71%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 108.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 121.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.21%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.08%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.25%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.83%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.