205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.88%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.26%
Cost reduction while QRVO shows 2.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
27.53%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
23.96%
Margin expansion while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
108.00%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
144.50%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-95.91%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-96.02%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-95.92%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-96.04%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.05%
Similar other expenses growth to QRVO's 112.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
24.73%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QRVO's 108.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.24%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 121.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
29.67%
Tax expense growth less than half of QRVO's 62.27%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
22.34%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.92%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.36%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.19%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.28%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.