205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.31%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.95%
Cost reduction while QRVO shows 2.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.08%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.49%
Margin expansion while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.79%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.24%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
59.31%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
63.07%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 13.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
24.74%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
27.68%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 13.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-82.46%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.98%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QRVO's 108.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.50%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 121.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.50%
Tax expense growth less than half of QRVO's 62.27%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
587.55%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
603.78%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
558.82%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
568.75%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.89%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.76%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.