205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.42%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
1.20%
Cost growth 50-75% of QRVO's 2.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-49.76%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.62%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.27%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.57%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.42%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-76.74%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-71.13%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.13%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-261.50%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.85%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-180.00%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 108.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-199.28%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 121.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.56%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-185.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-206.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.62%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.23%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.23%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.