205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.98%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.01%
Cost growth above 1.5x QRVO's 2.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.85%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.46%
Margin expansion while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.40%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.55%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.84%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.80%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.68%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.47%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 13.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
34.61%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
23.51%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 13.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
17.39%
Other expenses growth less than half of QRVO's 112.30%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
33.15%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QRVO's 108.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.17%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 121.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-28.03%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
52.80%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.20%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.33%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.33%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.80%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.