205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.77%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
0.54%
Cost growth less than half of QRVO's 2.36%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-7.59%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.65%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.41%
Other expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.13%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.24%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-21.68%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.61%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.18%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.28%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.44%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.44%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 108.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 121.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.65%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-29.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.11%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.57%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.43%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.42%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.