205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.55%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.72%
Similar cost growth to QRVO's 4.48%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-0.04%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.30%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x QRVO's 4.29%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.55%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.37%
Total costs growth above 1.5x QRVO's 1.63%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.54%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.07%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-166.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.01%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.27%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.54%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.22%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.