205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
4.00
Similar to MRVL's ratio of 4.42. Walter Schloss would see both operating with a similar safety margin.
2.96
0.5–0.75x MRVL's 4.02. Martin Whitman might be concerned about coverage if a crisis hits.
0.61
Below 0.5x MRVL's 1.42. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
74.00
Coverage below 0.5x MRVL's 407.28. Michael Burry might foresee difficulties in meeting interest obligations if turbulence hits.
1.84
Short-term coverage of 1.84 while MRVL has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.