205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-3.57%
Negative ROE while QCOM stands at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.54%
Negative ROA while QCOM stands at 0.14%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.78%
Both companies show negative ROCE. Martin Whitman would investigate if external factors hamper profitability.
27.59%
Gross margin 50-75% of QCOM's 38.14%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
-5.19%
Both companies are negative at the operating level. Martin Whitman would see if the entire niche faces fundamental challenges.
-6.11%
Negative net margin while QCOM has 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.