PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
21.62%
Revenue growth of 21.62% while KETL.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
15.26%
Gross profit growth of 15.26% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
19.39%
EBIT growth of 19.39% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
20.32%
Operating income growth of 20.32% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
27.46%
Net income growth of 27.46% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
30.00%
EPS growth of 30.00% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
30.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 30.00% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
4.36%
Share change of 4.36% while KETL.L is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
3.73%
Diluted share change of 3.73% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
52.39%
Dividend growth of 52.39% while KETL.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
632.26%
OCF growth of 632.26% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
400.79%
FCF growth of 400.79% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
425.49%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
74.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
67.89%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1221.33%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KETL.L is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
291.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
348.68%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
334.49%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KETL.L's 100.00% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
533.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
260.55%
Positive short-term CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.08%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
92.81%
Positive short-term equity growth while KETL.L is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
1107.99%
Stable or rising dividend while KETL.L is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
107.80%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while KETL.L is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
66.22%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while KETL.L cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-19.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while KETL.L shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.41%
Inventory is declining while KETL.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
20.56%
Asset growth of 20.56% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
37.73%
BV/share growth of 37.73% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
226.54%
Debt growth of 226.54% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.00%
SG&A growth of 9.00% while KETL.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.