PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.69%
Revenue growth under 50% of KETL.L's 60.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.94%
Negative gross profit growth while KETL.L is at 59.30%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.01%
Negative EBIT growth while KETL.L is at 66.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.01%
Negative operating income growth while KETL.L is at 66.56%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-13.78%
Negative net income growth while KETL.L stands at 69.66%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-13.61%
Negative EPS growth while KETL.L is at 71.52%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-13.61%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KETL.L is at 71.52%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.18%
Dividend growth above 1.5x KETL.L's 56.42%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
113.67%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x KETL.L's 94.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
114.15%
FCF growth above 1.5x KETL.L's 30.77%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
1.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KETL.L's 56.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
1.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KETL.L's 56.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
1.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KETL.L's 56.60%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
113.67%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KETL.L's 21.91%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
113.67%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KETL.L's 21.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
113.67%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KETL.L's 21.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-13.78%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while KETL.L is at 52.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-13.78%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while KETL.L is 52.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-13.78%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KETL.L is 52.45%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.18%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x KETL.L's 70.24%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
243.18%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x KETL.L's 70.24%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
243.18%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x KETL.L's 70.24%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.32%
SG&A declining or stable vs. KETL.L's 62.20%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.