215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KETL.L's 41.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
1.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KETL.L's 41.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
1.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of KETL.L's 41.54%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
113.67%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KETL.L's 85.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
113.67%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KETL.L's 85.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
113.67%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KETL.L's 85.56%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
-13.78%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while KETL.L is at 50.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-13.78%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while KETL.L is 50.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-13.78%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KETL.L is 50.69%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.18%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x KETL.L's 52.22%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
243.18%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x KETL.L's 52.22%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
243.18%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x KETL.L's 52.22%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.