PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of KETL.L's 66.58%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
33.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of KETL.L's 66.58%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
33.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of KETL.L's 66.58%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
25.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KETL.L's 148.88%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
25.36%
Below 50% of KETL.L's 148.88%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
25.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KETL.L's 148.88%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-4.42%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while KETL.L is at 65.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-4.42%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while KETL.L is 65.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-4.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KETL.L is 65.14%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.07%
Below 50% of KETL.L's 95.39%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
21.07%
Below 50% of KETL.L's 95.39%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
21.07%
Below 50% of KETL.L's 95.39%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.