PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.95%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
91.95%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
88.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
136.47%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KETL.L is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
136.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
10.67%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
23.49%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
23.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
43.22%
Positive short-term CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.15%
Stable or rising dividend while KETL.L is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
14.15%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while KETL.L is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-66.74%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.