PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
511.47%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
358.03%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.05%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KETL.L is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
237.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.29%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
23.77%
Below 50% of KETL.L's 110.74%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
603.78%
Stable or rising dividend while KETL.L is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
481.32%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while KETL.L is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.