PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
439.24%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
284.42%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
675.97%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KETL.L is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
447.46%
Positive OCF/share growth while KETL.L is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.10%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-70.79%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
347.86%
Stable or rising dividend while KETL.L is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
147.93%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while KETL.L is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.