PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 173.72%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
1.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 80.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
1.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 77.96%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
113.67%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 74.59%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
113.67%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 7.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
113.67%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MCB.L's 158.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-13.78%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-13.78%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-13.78%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MCB.L is 122.58%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.18%
Dividend/share CAGR of 243.18% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
243.18%
Dividend/share CAGR of 243.18% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
243.18%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 243.18% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.