PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 32.32%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
1.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 38.17%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
1.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 42.09%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
113.67%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 49.53%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
113.67%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to MCB.L's 124.40%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
113.67%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 1106.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-13.78%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MCB.L is at 289.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-13.78%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MCB.L is 438.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-13.78%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MCB.L is 237.04%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.18%
Stable or rising dividend while MCB.L is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
243.18%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while MCB.L is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
243.18%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while MCB.L cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.