PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.28%
Revenue growth of 31.28% while MCB.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
30.15%
Gross profit growth of 30.15% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
29.94%
EBIT growth of 29.94% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
29.94%
Operating income growth of 29.94% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
10.85%
Net income growth of 10.85% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
10.27%
EPS growth of 10.27% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
10.27%
Diluted EPS growth of 10.27% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.72%
Dividend reduction while MCB.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-41.33%
Negative OCF growth while MCB.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-42.12%
Negative FCF growth while MCB.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
33.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 156.15%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
33.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 69.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
33.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MCB.L's 66.53%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
25.36%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MCB.L is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
25.36%
Positive OCF/share growth while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
25.36%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-4.42%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-4.42%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-4.42%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 21.07% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
21.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 21.07% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
21.07%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 21.07% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.63%
SG&A growth of 27.63% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.