PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 151.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
33.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 68.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
33.50%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
25.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 147.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
25.36%
Below 50% of MCB.L's 241.98%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
25.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MCB.L's 46.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-4.42%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MCB.L is at 92.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-4.42%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MCB.L is 574.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-4.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MCB.L is 113.04%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 21.07% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
21.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 21.07% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
21.07%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 21.07% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.