PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.50%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to MCB.L's 32.32%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
33.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MCB.L's 38.17%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
33.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MCB.L's 42.09%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
25.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MCB.L's 49.53%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
25.36%
Below 50% of MCB.L's 124.40%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
25.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 1106.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-4.42%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MCB.L is at 289.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-4.42%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MCB.L is 438.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-4.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MCB.L is 237.04%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.07%
Stable or rising dividend while MCB.L is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
21.07%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while MCB.L is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
21.07%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while MCB.L cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.