PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.91%
Revenue growth of 0.91% while MCB.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
8.10%
Gross profit growth of 8.10% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-18.91%
Negative EBIT growth while MCB.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.91%
Negative operating income growth while MCB.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-24.66%
Negative net income growth while MCB.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-21.12%
Negative EPS growth while MCB.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-21.12%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MCB.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.96%
Share reduction while MCB.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.96%
Reduced diluted shares while MCB.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
49.21%
Dividend growth of 49.21% while MCB.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
8.59%
OCF growth of 8.59% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
2.37%
FCF growth of 2.37% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
40.27%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 147.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
40.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MCB.L's 66.02%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
40.27%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
41.74%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 90.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
41.74%
Below 50% of MCB.L's 162.90%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
41.74%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MCB.L's 29.80%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
-25.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MCB.L is at 72.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-25.02%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MCB.L is 504.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-25.02%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MCB.L is 524.21%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 80.64% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
80.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 80.64% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
80.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 80.64% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.69%
SG&A growth of 66.69% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.