PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 32.32%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
91.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 38.17%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
88.76%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 42.09%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
136.47%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 49.53%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
136.47%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to MCB.L's 124.40%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
10.67%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 1106.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
23.49%
Below 50% of MCB.L's 289.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
23.49%
Below 50% of MCB.L's 438.52%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
43.22%
Below 50% of MCB.L's 237.04%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.15%
Stable or rising dividend while MCB.L is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
14.15%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while MCB.L is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-66.74%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.