PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.32%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 76.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
144.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
77.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 4.20%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
69.07%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MCB.L is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-20.87%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
19.28%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-73.63%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-69.41%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MCB.L is 95.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-64.83%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 75.94% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-48.73%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MCB.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-2.60%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MCB.L invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.