PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
683.20%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 28.60%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.08%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MCB.L's 36.99%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
1237.81%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MCB.L is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.23%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
172.43%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MCB.L's 334.21%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.30%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 86.10%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.11%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
875.70%
Dividend/share CAGR of 875.70% while MCB.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.64%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while MCB.L cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.