PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
638.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 27.18%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
202.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 28.56%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
170.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 29.65%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
176.11%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with MCB.L's 165.86%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
67.88%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to MCB.L's 71.75%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
-20.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MCB.L stands at 768.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
268.34%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of MCB.L's 337.50%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
434.45%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 40.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
471.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 28.97%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.46%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
10.25%
Positive short-term equity growth while MCB.L is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MCB.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MCB.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.