215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
21.62%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MCB.L's 0.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
15.26%
Positive gross profit growth while MCB.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
19.39%
Positive EBIT growth while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
20.32%
Positive operating income growth while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
27.46%
Positive net income growth while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.00%
Positive EPS growth while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MCB.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
4.36%
Share count expansion well above MCB.L's 3.39%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.73%
Diluted share count expanding well above MCB.L's 2.66%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
52.39%
Dividend growth of 52.39% while MCB.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
632.26%
OCF growth above 1.5x MCB.L's 1.96%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
400.79%
Positive FCF growth while MCB.L is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
425.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 32.32%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
74.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 38.17%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
67.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 42.09%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1221.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 49.53%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
291.54%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 124.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
348.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MCB.L's 1106.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
334.49%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MCB.L's 289.41%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
533.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MCB.L's 438.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
260.55%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to MCB.L's 237.04%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 36.61%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
92.81%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MCB.L's 28.39%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
1107.99%
Stable or rising dividend while MCB.L is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
107.80%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while MCB.L is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
66.22%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while MCB.L cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-19.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while MCB.L shows 2.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.41%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
20.56%
Positive asset growth while MCB.L is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
37.73%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MCB.L's 23.57%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
226.54%
We have some new debt while MCB.L reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.00%
SG&A growth well above MCB.L's 1.34%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.