PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.95%
10Y CAGR of 91.95% while PZC.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
91.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to PZC.L's 85.24%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
88.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
136.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 136.47% while PZC.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
136.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
10.67%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PZC.L's 20.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
23.49%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 23.49% while PZC.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
23.49%
Below 50% of PZC.L's 53.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
43.22%
Positive short-term CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 14.15% while PZC.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
14.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 14.15% while PZC.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-66.74%
Negative near-term dividend growth while PZC.L invests at 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.