PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
144.26%
10Y CAGR of 144.26% while PZC.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
144.26%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
82.96%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
64.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 64.47% while PZC.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
64.47%
Below 50% of PZC.L's 26186.02%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
31.20%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PZC.L's 129.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-31.08%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PZC.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-31.08%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-27.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.86%
Dividend/share CAGR of 63.86% while PZC.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
63.86%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x PZC.L's 11.88%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
35.34%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x PZC.L's 6.42%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.