PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
407.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PZC.L's 65.10%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
164.56%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
33.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PZC.L's 13.67%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-175.69%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-132.01%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PZC.L is at 100.75%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-138.62%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
109.51%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PZC.L's 82.58%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
69.66%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PZC.L's 19.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1736.70%
Positive short-term CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.88%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
0.73%
Positive short-term equity growth while PZC.L is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while PZC.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.