PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
638.86%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
202.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
170.93%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
176.11%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PZC.L's 815.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
67.88%
Positive OCF/share growth while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-20.05%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
268.34%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
434.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
471.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.46%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
10.25%
Positive short-term equity growth while PZC.L is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.