PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
945.38%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
328.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
97.14%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
513.91%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PZC.L is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
675.84%
Positive OCF/share growth while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
69.04%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
713.07%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2558.26%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
3101.14%
Positive short-term CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.76%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
24.87%
Positive short-term equity growth while PZC.L is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
250.23%
Stable or rising dividend while PZC.L is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
583.14%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while PZC.L is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
168.38%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while PZC.L cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.