PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
21.62%
Positive revenue growth while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
15.26%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x PZC.L's 10.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
19.39%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x PZC.L's 13.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
20.32%
Operating income growth under 50% of PZC.L's 123.33%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
27.46%
Net income growth under 50% of PZC.L's 143.10%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
30.00%
EPS growth under 50% of PZC.L's 142.96%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
30.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PZC.L's 142.96%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
4.36%
Share count expansion well above PZC.L's 0.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.73%
Diluted share count expanding well above PZC.L's 0.22%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
52.39%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while PZC.L cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
632.26%
Positive OCF growth while PZC.L is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
400.79%
FCF growth above 1.5x PZC.L's 2.30%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
425.49%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
74.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
67.89%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1221.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PZC.L's 161.55%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
291.54%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PZC.L's 0.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
348.68%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
334.49%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
533.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
260.55%
Positive short-term CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.08%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PZC.L is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
92.81%
Positive short-term equity growth while PZC.L is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
1107.99%
Stable or rising dividend while PZC.L is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
107.80%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while PZC.L is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
66.22%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while PZC.L cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-19.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while PZC.L shows 5.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.41%
Inventory is declining while PZC.L stands at 14.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
20.56%
Asset growth above 1.5x PZC.L's 1.55%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
37.73%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PZC.L's 3.52%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
226.54%
We have some new debt while PZC.L reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.00%
SG&A growth well above PZC.L's 9.45%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.