PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.69%
Revenue growth of 1.69% while SDI.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-0.94%
Negative gross profit growth while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.01%
Negative EBIT growth while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.01%
Negative operating income growth while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-13.78%
Negative net income growth while SDI.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-13.61%
Negative EPS growth while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-13.61%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.18%
Dividend growth of 243.18% while SDI.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
113.67%
OCF growth of 113.67% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
114.15%
FCF growth of 114.15% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
1.69%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
1.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
1.69%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
113.67%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
113.67%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 7.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
113.67%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SDI.L's 306.36%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-13.78%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-13.78%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-13.78%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is 85.60%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.18%
Dividend/share CAGR of 243.18% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
243.18%
Dividend/share CAGR of 243.18% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
243.18%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 243.18% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.32%
SG&A growth of 11.32% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.