215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.28%
Revenue growth of 31.28% while SDI.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
30.15%
Gross profit growth of 30.15% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
29.94%
EBIT growth of 29.94% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
29.94%
Operating income growth of 29.94% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
10.85%
Net income growth of 10.85% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
10.27%
EPS growth of 10.27% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
10.27%
Diluted EPS growth of 10.27% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.72%
Dividend reduction while SDI.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-41.33%
Negative OCF growth while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-42.12%
Negative FCF growth while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
33.50%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
33.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
33.50%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
25.36%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
25.36%
Positive OCF/share growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
25.36%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-4.42%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-4.42%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-4.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is 44.83%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 21.07% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
21.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 21.07% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
21.07%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 21.07% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.63%
SG&A growth of 27.63% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.