PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.50%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
33.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
33.50%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
25.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 0.35%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
25.36%
Below 50% of SDI.L's 365.58%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
25.36%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-4.42%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-4.42%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SDI.L is 211.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-4.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is 13.86%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 21.07% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
21.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 21.07% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
21.07%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 21.07% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.