PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.91%
Revenue growth of 0.91% while SDI.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
8.10%
Gross profit growth of 8.10% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-18.91%
Negative EBIT growth while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.91%
Negative operating income growth while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-24.66%
Negative net income growth while SDI.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-21.12%
Negative EPS growth while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-21.12%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.96%
Share reduction while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.96%
Reduced diluted shares while SDI.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
49.21%
Dividend growth of 49.21% while SDI.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
8.59%
OCF growth of 8.59% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
2.37%
FCF growth of 2.37% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
40.27%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
40.27%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
40.27%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
41.74%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 0.35%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
41.74%
Below 50% of SDI.L's 365.58%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
41.74%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-25.02%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-25.02%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SDI.L is 211.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-25.02%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is 13.86%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 80.64% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
80.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 80.64% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
80.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 80.64% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.69%
SG&A growth of 66.69% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.