215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.95%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
91.95%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
88.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
136.47%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
136.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
10.67%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
23.49%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
23.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
43.22%
Below 50% of SDI.L's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 14.15% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
14.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 14.15% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-66.74%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SDI.L invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.